Research
![]()
The Native American Wellness Scale (NAWS)
The Development of an Intertribal Quality of Life Measure for Native American and Indigenous Populations
Background and Significance
Native Americans represent a population in dire need of wellness attention (Herring, 1997; LaFramboise, 1988; Terrell, 1994). Studies have established that widespread disparities exist between Native Americans and other ethnic groups in the areas of health, mental health, and education, and can be attributed in large part, to a lack of culturally appropriate, standardized assessment instruments (Duran & Duran, 1995; Fiske, 2002; Krieger, 2001; United States Department of Health and Human Services, [UDHHS], 2001; Weaver, 2002). Dynamics such as social disadvantage, racism, and the impact of historical trauma on the Native American lifeworld, for example, directly impact the course of health and wellness throughout the lifespan; yet, these dynamics are rarely, if ever, considered within the context of assessment (APA, 2003; DHHS, 1999, 2001; Duran & Duran; Krieger; Rogler, 1999). As a result, Native Americans have the lowest levels of academic achievement and highest drop-out rates in the United States (U.S. Department of Education, 1991), face some of the highest rates of diabetes and obesity in the world (Wharton & Hampl, 2004), and have an average life expectancy that is six years less than the rest of the U. S. population (Indian Health Service [IHS], 2002). In fact, age-adjusted death rates are greater for Native Americans than the rest of the U.S. population for alcoholism (740% higher), suicide (190% higher), homicide (180% higher), injuries (340 % higher), and tuberculosis (500% higher; IHS, 2001). According to the U. S. Commission on Civil Rights (2004), the lack of culturally appropriate assessment measures is a primary cultural, social, and structural barrier that continues to limit Native American access to health care.
Given the enormity of social, health, and mental health problems, disparate access to resources, and ineffective health and mental health interventions experienced by Native peoples, it is not only worthwhile, but necessary, to develop a culturally-specific measure of wellness appropriate for use among indigenous populations (Sue & Zane, 1994, USDHHS, 2000; USDHHS, 2001). Thus, the goal of this study is to create the Native American Wellness Scale (NAWS), a measure designed to target strengths and vulnerabilities, and provide awareness of the effects of sociohistorical factors on five wellness domains: (a) physical well-being, (b) psychological well-being, (c) spiritual well-being, (d) emotional well-being, and (e) cultural well-being. A contextual model of Native American wellness (Alvarado, 2005) that is theoretically based on Native American postcolonial psychology (Duran & Duran, 1995) and historical trauma theory (Brave Heart & DeBruyn, 1998; Brave Heart-Jordan & DeBruyn, 1995; Duran & Duran; Duran, Duran, & Brave Heart, 1998; Jilek, 1981; Solomon, Kotler, & Mikulincer, 1988) will serve as the foundation for the development of the NAWS.
Social Change Implications
Early effective assessment permits limited resources to be utilized for designing and implementing front-end prevention strategies, as opposed to more costly back-end remediation. Thus, the Native American Wellness Scale (NAWS) ) may contribute to positive social change as follows. First, the measure will enhance social awareness of the impact of historical trauma on the psyche and lifeworld of Native American people. Second, it would allow service providers to create optimum interventions, accurate timelines, and health service deliverability. Third, use of the NAWS would foster a multidisciplinary approach to health and mental healthcare. The team approach could have an increased potential of affecting social change than when groups work in isolation. Fourth, utilization of the NAWS would serve to promote communication and trust between Native Americans and nonNative Americans, thereby increasing the likelihood of follow-through on health and mental health care (Oetzel, Duran, Lucero, Jiang, Novins, Manson, & Beals, 2006). Finally, current disparities in health and mental health could be reduced because the construct of measurement would be better defined.
Location and Contact Information
George Smeaton, Ph. D. Assistant Dean--Research and Evaluation College of Social, Behavioral, and Health Sciences Walden University (612)801-2310 george.smeaton@waldenu.edu
United States
Walden University College of Social, Behavioral,
and Health Sciences Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Dissertation chair, members, and principal investigator
George Smeaton, Ph.D., Dissertation Committee Chair, Walden University
Stephanie Cawthon, Ph. D., Dissertation Committee Member, Walden University
William Disch, Ph. D., Dissertation Committee Member, Walden University
More Information
If you are of Native American, Alaskan Native, Native Hawaiian, or other indigenous background and would like to help make a difference in the delivery of health and mental healthcare for indigenous peoples, please consider volunteering as a research participant for the Native American Wellness Scale (NAWS) study. Complete the form below and you will be sent details via email.
For more information on the Native American Wellness Scale Study, please contact Denise Alvarado at dalvarad@waldenu.edu or nativewellness@gmail.com.
![]()
References
Alvarado, D. M. (2005). The relationships among cultural identity, spirituality, and wellness in a Native American
population sample. Unpublished thesis. Walden University.
Brave Heart, M. Y., & DeBruyn, L. M. (1998). The American Indian Holocaust: Healing historical unresolved grief.
American Indian Alaska Native Mental Health Research, 8(2), 60-82.
BraveHeart-Jordan, M. (1989). Return to the sacred path: Healing from historical trauma and historical unresolved
grief among the Lakota. PhD dissertation, Smith College.
Duran, E., Duran, B., & Brave Heart, M.Y.H. (1998). Native Americans and the trauma of history. In Studying Native
America: Problems and prospects of Native American studies (pp. 60-76). New York: Social Science Research
Council.
Duran, E. & Duran, B. (1995). Native American postcolonial psychology. Albany: SUNY Press.
Duran B., Oetzel, J., Lucero, J., Jiang, Y., Novins, D.K., Manson, S.M., Beals, J. et al. (2006). Rural American Indians’
perspectives of obstacles in the mental health treatment process in three treatment sectors. Psychology Services, 3
(2), 117-128 .
Fiske, S. T. (2002). What we know about bias and conflict, the problem of the century. Current Directions in
Psychological Science, 11, 123-127.
Garrett, M. T., & Pichette, E. F. (2000). Red as an apple: Native American acculturation and counseling with or without
reservation. Journal of Counseling and Development, 78, 3-17.
Hays, R. D., Sherbourne, C. D., & Mazel, R. M. (1993). The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Economics 2(3),
217-227.
Herring, R. D. (1990). Understanding Native American values: Process and content concerns for counselors.
Counseling and Values, 34, 134-137;
Indian Health Services. (2002). Facts on Indian health disparities. Retrieved July 23, 2004 from
http://info.ihs.gov/Health11.pdf.
Jilek, W. G. (1981). Anomic depression, alcoholism and a culturecongenial Indian Response. Journal of Studies on
Alcohol, 9, 159–170.
Krieger, N. (1999). Embodying inequality: a review of concepts, measures, and methods for studying health
consequences of discrimination. International Journal of Health Services, 29:295-352.
LaFromboise, T. A. (1988). Cultural and cognitive considerations in the prevention of American Indian adolescent
suicide. Journal of Adolescence, 11, 139-153.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied
Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.
Rogler, L. H. (1999). Methodological sources of cultural insensitivity in mental health research. American Psychologist,
54, 424—433.
Solomon, Z., Kotler, M., Mikulincer, M. (1988). Combat relater posttraumatic stress disorder among second-generation
Holocaust survivors: Preliminary findings. American Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 865-68.
Sue, S., Zane, N., & Young, K. (1994). Research on psychotherapy with culturally diverse populations. In: Bergin AE,
Garfield SL, eds. Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change. 4th ed.
New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc
Terrell, D. (1994). Abnormal psychology. In D. Matsumoto (Ed.). People: Psychology from a cultural perspective (pp.
138-156). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Underwood, L. G., & Teresi, J. A. (2002). The daily spiritual experiences scale: Development, theoretical description,
reliability, exploratory factor analysis, and preliminary construct validity using health related data. Annals of Behavioral
Medicine, 24, 22-33.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Mental Health: Culture, Race, and Ethnicity-A Supplement
to Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, Md: US Dept of Health and Human Services.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (US DHHS). (2000). Healthy people 2010: Understanding and
improving health, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. Retrieved July 22, 2004 from
http://www.bphc.hrsa.gov/quality/HealthyPeople2010.htm.
Weaver, H. (2000). Indigenous people in a multicultural society: Unique issues for human services. Social Work, 45, 96.
Wharton, C. M., Hampl, J. S.(2004). Beverage consumption and risk of obesity among Native Americans in Arizona.
Nutrition Reviews, 62, 153-159
Whitbeck, L. B., Adams, G. W. Hoyt, D. R. Chen, X. (2004). Conceptualizing and Measuring Historical Trauma Among
American Indian People. American Journal of Community Psychology, 33(3/4)